Report shows Ontario ratepayers have paid $6 billion to dump electricity

Brady Yauch has produced a report, along with Scott Mitchnick, on the cost of selling electricity to exporters for less than it cost to procure the supply:

Ontario electricity customers have paid more than $6 billion to cover the cost of exporting the province’s energy surplus, according to a new study from the Consumer Policy Institute.

Over the last decade, Ontario customers have paid $6.3 billion to cover the cost of selling high-priced electricity to customers outside of the province, according to a new study by the Consumer Policy Institute. A majority of those costs – $5.8 billion – have come since 2009, as demand for electricity in Ontario has fallen, while more generation capacity continues to be added, creating a growing surplus that gets dumped at below-cost prices in places like New York and Michigan.

The quote is from the blog post; the full study is, Power Exports at What Cost? How Ontario Electricity Customers are paying more to dump the province’s excess power.

cpiestimates

The numbers match, almost exactly, my estimates using the same calculations I use in charting the cost of exports in my weekly and monthly reports. I recommend reading Yauch’s work because I find it very accessible – more than my own.

Read More »

Advertisements

useless electricity cost concern

The Ontario Liberal party, led by Premier Wynne, has a petition offering people to courageously add their name to “Support Lower Hydro Bills.” The petition follows a promise to rebate 8% of electricity bills – equivalent to the the provincial portion of the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST). Given the history of the Liberal governments in Ontario, perhaps a more meaningful question is:

When was a Liberal government least authentic in displaying concern for consumer electricity costs?

surveymonkey2
CLICK TO ANSWER

 

Read More »

Mitigating Ontario Electricity Costs – The Long-Ago Missed Solar Opportunity

This is a post written by Bruce Sharp. An earlier version appeared on Linkedin.

Well, the (subsidized, one would suppose) L.E.D. light bulb finally went on at Queen’s Park last week concerning electricity costs.

Kathleen Wynne says high cost of hydro is concern across province | CBC

Did a single by-election loss cause this awakening?
In this day of politicians seemingly and completely incapable of climbing down from heavily entrenched positions, this seems to represent at least some progress – admitting there’s a problem.

 

Upon hearing this news, my mind went to what the government would do to provide relief – the depth, breadth and source of funds. Since 2003, we’ve had a number of dubious band-aid solutions, including a retroactive price freeze, the Ontario Clean Energy Benefit, an end to the Debt Retirement Charge (for residential consumers) and the Ontario Electricity Support Payment.
What would be next?
We now know it’ll be a removal of the 8% provincial sales tax — for those who vote and perhaps small business. Estimates have put the cost at $ 1 billion per year – suggestive of a base of $ 12.5 billion per year. That looks to me something like 70 TWh at 18 cents/kWh or perhaps slightly more energy at a slightly lesser rate. The Regulated Price Plan is about 58 TWh per year and excludes those on retail contracts, so perhaps the threshold will be 250,000 kWh per year.
The inappropriateness of this new measure should be obvious to anyone with even a modicum of energy policy instinct and yet the policy will have appeal for some. For all but the latter group, one has to wonder: does the government think we’re all stupid?
Some of the reactions have been bang-on, including Ontario Regional Chief Isadore Day’s reference to the move as a “shell game” and a Globe and Mail editorial referring to the move and electricity file as a “total mess”.

Read More »

Tom Adams’ Open Letter to Dr. Dianne Saxe, Environmental Commissioner of Ontario

 

Tom Adams has a very good post following a discussion on Zoomer radio with the current Environmental Commissioner of Ontario.

Dr. Dianne Saxe Environmental Commissioner…

On Wednesday last week, you and I were guests on the radio show “Fight Back with Libby Znaimer” on the AM radio station CFZM Toronto. A podcast of that interview is available here. You made the following six major points:

  1. Climate change means that Ontario has much higher temperatures and longer heat waves. Ontario’s infrastructure was built for the climate that we used to have but unfortunately that is over and won’t come back…If we look at the data, there is a very significant difference that we’re seeing in the last couple of decades from the average temperature of the 20th century, which is what most of our infrastructure was built to.
  2. If you look at what is driving Ontario rates up, conservation contributed only 4% of Global Adjustment in 2015.
  3. Residential rates in Ontario are average for North America.
  4. Ontario’s eliminating coal-fired power is one of the big reasons why last year, for the first year since records began, that we didn’t have any smog days.
  5. When the Ontario Liberals formed government after the Conservatives, Ontario’s whole power system was running at the very edge of its capacity with shreds and patches.
  6. Ontario’s publicly-backed electricity debt is being paid down.

Read the rebuttals to these points at Open Letter to Dr. Dianne Saxe, Environmental Commissioner of Ontario — Tom Adams Energy – ideas for a smarter grid

conservation_export

Read More »

Intermittent Renewables Can’t Favorably Transform Grid Electricity

If you’ve never read Gail Tverberg, this would be a good place to start.

Our Finite World

Many people are hoping for wind and solar PV to transform grid electricity in a favorable way. Is this really possible? Is it really feasible for intermittent renewables to generate a large share of grid electricity? The answer increasingly looks as if it is, “No, the costs are too great, and the return on investment would be way too low.” We are already encountering major grid problems, even with low penetrations of intermittent renewable electricity: US, 5.4% of 2015 electricity consumption; China, 3.9%; Germany, 19.5%; Australia, 6.6%.

In fact, I have come to the rather astounding conclusion that even if wind turbines and solar PV could be built at zero cost, it would not make sense to continue to add them to the electric grid in the absence of very much better and cheaper electricity storage than we have today. There are too many costs outside building the devices themselves. It…

View original post 3,706 more words